LIVE ANALYSIS

A home decor brand’s February catalog.
Every spread measured.

We took a real catalog, connected it to order data and a mailing list, and ran our attribution engine. Here’s what we found: a 4.6x revenue gap between the best and worst performing spreads.

4 spreads · 76,000 mailed · 30 day attribution window
Campaign Performance
February 2026 Drop
76K
Mailed
2,814
Orders
$1.34M
Revenue
3.7%
Response Rate
$689K
Featured Revenue
Exact product match
51%
$427K
Variant Revenue
Same product, different option
32%
$225K
Halo Revenue
Category affinity
17%
Revenue by Spread
Pgs 4–5
Pgs 6–7
Pgs 8–9
Pgs 10–11
Featured
Variant
Halo
Revenue Per Thousand Mailed
Pgs 4–5
Seating + Accessories
$7,240
Pgs 6–7
Slipcovered Seating
$5,500
Pgs 10–11
Dining
$3,480
Pgs 8–9
Rugs
$1,580
💡

The 4.6x Gap

Pages 4–5 (Seating + Accessories) generate $7,240 per thousand mailed. Pages 8–9 (Rugs) generate $1,580. Same print cost, same postage, 4.6x difference in return. This is the kind of insight that changes how you build your next catalog.

SPREAD DETAIL
Every spread, fully measured
Revenue broken into three attribution buckets, with conversion and efficiency metrics. Sorted by revenue per thousand mailed.
SpreadFeaturedVariantHaloTotalConv.RPM
Seating + Living Accessories
Pages 4–5 · 16 products
$282K$168K$100K$550K1.42%$7,240
Slipcovered Seating + Decor
Pages 6–7 · 14 products
$215K$130K$73K$418K1.08%$5,500
Dining Collection
Pages 10–11 · 10 products
$148K$72K$45K$265K0.71%$3,480
Rug Collection
Pages 8–9 · 15 products
$44K$57K$19K$120K0.32%$1,580
RECOMMENDATIONS
What the data says to do next
Every StyleBoard analysis comes with specific, actionable guidance for your next catalog.

Double down on Pages 4–5

Your highest performing spread combines hero seating with curated accessories (pillows, throws, lighting). The mix of high AOV anchors and impulse add ons drives both direct revenue and variant purchases. Consider replicating this layout structure in other category sections.

Expand the slipcovered seating story

Pages 6–7 perform well but have fewer products than Pages 4–5. There’s room to add complementary items (side tables, lamps, pillows) that could lift variant and halo revenue closer to the Pages 4–5 benchmark.

Rethink the rug spread

Pages 8–9 have the most products (15) but the lowest RPM. Notably, variant revenue ($57K) exceeds featured ($44K), meaning customers browse the category but buy different rugs. Consider a curated half page selection instead of a full spread, and use the freed space for higher converting categories.

Test dining placement

Pages 10–11 sit at the back of the analyzed section. Dining converts at 0.71% but has fewer products. Test moving the dining spread earlier in the book where engagement is typically higher, and measure whether position affects conversion.

Hello, World!